Failed Empire

Chronicling the collapse of a failed society

Hypocrisy Defined: Christians Against Universal Health Care

There’s an amusing – if tragic – anecdote circulating the blogosphere at the moment about one of the newly elected teabagger darlings inadvertently whining about the lack of a public option he had so fervently derided. Republican Andy Harris lamented the fact that he would be without health care for an astonishing 28 days; the exchange with his aids was quite telling as to the intellectual and moral bankruptcy of most teabaggers and other right-wingers:

“According to an unnamed congressional staffer quoted by [Glenn Thrush of Politico], [Andy] Harris stood up at the meeting “and asked the two ladies who were answering questions why it had to take so long, what he would do without 28 days of health care.”

“Harris then asked if he could purchase insurance from the government to cover the gap,” added the aide, who was struck by the similarity to Harris’s request and the public option he denounced as a gateway to socialized medicine.” [ h/t Mock, Paper, Scissors ]

So this teabagger – a physician, no less – who in public rabidly denounces universal health care or anything even resembling it, then turns around and hypocritically demands why a public option is not available for himself. One wonders if he is even aware of his loathesome intellectual dishonesty, or whether he simply believes he is entitled to something more than ordinary plebes because he is an elected official.

But the fact is, we find such ludicrous hypocrisy with virtually every right-winger we encounter. I would wager that at least 90% of the people I know have some gripe to grind with the health insurance companies, and most of them have been burned in some way or another. I’ve commented previously that one of the underlying causes of these inconsistent beliefs about health care has to do with the doublespeak use of “socialized” as meaning “fascistic.” Indeed, this seemingly subtle impediment has thrown such a wrench into the works that meaningful dialogue on the issue is virtually impossible. But I’d like to address a slightly different issue this time around: Christians who oppose universal health care.

Now, religious fanatics in general are an odd bunch who live in a fantasy world of demons and goblins and millennia-old ethical codes. Ordinary logic simply doesn’t apply in their primitive and highly distorted way of looking at the world. But in the United States we have a phenomenon even stranger than a bunch of bearded zealots in the desert enslaving women, chopping off heads and riding camels. Here we have seemingly intelligent, relatively highly educated people living in one of the world’s foremost developed nations, enjoying the most succulent fruits of technology and all that science has to offer. And yet somehow – miraculously, one might say – these walking oddities manage to simultaneously adhere to an ancient belief system that revolves around human sacrifice, omnipresent spirits, and the notion of eternal damnation in a pit of fire.

Christianity is a strange religion, as all religions are. But at its core – if we exclude the barbaric Old Testament – the foundation of Christianity is love, compassion and forgiveness. Jesus didn’t walk around saying, “Shun the non-believers,” or “If they look intimidating, kill them first.” Even if one discounts the potentially more accurate non-Christian accounts of Jesus’s life, his message still remains clear in the Christians’ own Bible: “Love your neighbor as yourself,” he said. “Whatever you do for the least among us, you do for me.” And so it is utterly puzzling and frustrating when we routinely encounter self-professed Christians who are so opposed to the notion of universal health care.

Let me offer a personal anecdote as an example. My parents are good people. They are relatively highly educated (both college graduates); my mother has been a teacher in the public school system for 30 years. They are reasonably intelligent and know how to utilize the tools of scientific inquiry and critical thinking when it suits them to do so. But they are also fundamentalist Christians. Now, because we hold such different views on social, political and religious issues, we very rarely talk about anything deeper than the weather. But occasionally a larger issue is broached, such as in the following exchange:

Me: Even though there are a couple of positive elements, overall I don’t support Obama’s plan – it’s basically a massive giveaway to the insurance companies.

Mom: I don’t think the insurance companies are happy about it.

Me: Why not? They’re getting 45 million new customers. Don’t you think we should cut the insurance companies out of the deal all together? Why should they stand to profit from human illness?

Mom: So you advocate universal health care?

Me: Of course. Don’t you?

Mom: Well, sometimes when people get older, they develop chronic illnesses which require constant medical attention, which can costs tens of thousands of dollars. Are we going to just keep paying and paying and paying for all of these people?

This was, more or less, an actual conversation I had with my mother – a teacher, a college graduate, and a Christian. But her last statement is so rife with logical fallacies and moral inconsistencies that it is hard to know where to begin. First, the reason our health care costs are so inflated is because we have these wholly unnecessary, bloated middle-men jacking up the prices.

Second, my grandmother – my mother’s own mother – is one of these people with a chronic illness who requires constant, expensive medical attention. Along with contributions from her children, my grandmother gets by on Social Security and Medicare. So was my mother actually suggesting that we should not continue paying for my grandmother’s medical care? And if not my grandmother, then precisely whose grandmother?

Third, and most pertinent to this post, is the contrast between the ideal Christian perspective on the issue of health care, and the perspective held by many – seemingly most – self-professed Christians. Many Christians are fond of asking the question, W.W.J.D.? What would Jesus do? Now, as I recall the Jesus of the New Testament spent much of his life wandering the countryside, healing the poor and the weak. “Do unto others as you would have done to yourself,” he said, and – as mentioned above – “Whatever you do for the least among us, you do for me.” So how do you think the Jesus of the New Testament would have responded to my mother’s seemingly rhetorical question? The answer is painfully obvious to apparently everyone but the Christians.

Christians and other religious adherents thrive on ignorance and intellectual laziness. Indeed, the latter is considered a virtue in many religions, but in true doublespeak fashion has been termed “faith.” It is impossible to reason with such people, for they are convinced that critical thinking, in certain contexts, is a grave sin. Our only remedy, then, is to cut such people out of the debate altogether, for they are parasites standing in the way of the march of human progress. Until they are prepared to throw off the shackles of their primitive, ritualistic belief systems and make a meaningful contribution to our national dialogue, they should be treated according to what they truly are: irrelevant.

Advertisements

7 responses to “Hypocrisy Defined: Christians Against Universal Health Care

  1. Tengrain November 16, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    I’m sort of convinced that the Teabaggers see people that they don’t like as getting something for nothing. It doesn’t matter that the Teabagger gets the Medicare scooter, they earned it.

    I’ve had that conversation with a few of ’em. They get it that Medicare is socialized, but they believe that they alone earned it and that no one else does.

    The undesireable person next to them did not earn it, they stole it. I think that they have a hard time believing that the brown/black/yellow person next to them worked as hard as they did or whatevs.

    Regards,

    Tengrain

    • Andrew November 18, 2010 at 1:29 am

      That rather effectively sums up the teabagger/wingnut mentality. I’ve encountered more than a few rightwingers who openly complain about a social safety net of any kind, but then have no shame in utilizing these same services when it benefits them to do so.

      It’s a way of thinking that seems to be descendant from the wealthier Republicans’ mantra of “I got mine, so f*ck you.” And yes, there is almost certainly an element of racism involved.

  2. gratis dejtingsidor December 8, 2010 at 2:09 pm

    Very interesting and useful information, thanks!

  3. Mac March 15, 2011 at 5:52 pm

    Most “Christians” are so thoroughly yoked with “unbelievers” that they have no idea that their favorite schemes are just that – yoking with “unbelievers.”
    A few like the Amish, conservative Mennonites, and Hutterites really do follow their teachings. They do not participate in government benefit schemes, military, etc. Of course as with all human beings some of them fail to live up to their avowed beliefs, but that does not invalidate their entire belief systems.
    My fellow church members do not take care of their elders – the elderly live off Social Security, which is nothing but riding the backs of mostly people they consider “unbelievers.” They cannot imagine not signing up for Social Security, Medicare, whatever take-it-from-one-and-give-it-to another goodies are offered.
    They argue and divide over trifling matters like whether or not to have Sunday-School, women preachers, skirts or pants on the women, hair length, common or individual communion cups, how to break the communion bread, steeples on the meeting houses, etc., etc., while going along with the “heathen” on everything that affects their comforts. “Cadillac” Christians. No wonder it is hard to convert the “heathen.”

  4. moehoweird October 7, 2013 at 2:33 pm

    these fine christians who dont want health care,are backed by the same bunch that,seceded from the union,hate blacks didnt want integration,called FDR a communist,love war,used the name of jesus.to steal land and decimate native tribes,kill cultures, foist their unehtical biblical hypocrisy and using biblical proverbs everso selectively mount a well orchestrated campaign of mistruths while acting so un christian that they just seem to forget what jesus really said about helping thy brother……..thats why i gave up religion,too many pat robertsons,and crouches and x falwells to pander to the tea party and its mjguided pseudo intellectual christian zealots that buy into their crap……..praise jesus.but no health care for america,jesus would vote NO!!!!

    • moehoweird October 7, 2013 at 2:44 pm

      IT REALLY IS A SHAME THAT THE.RICHEST COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WHO DOES SO MUCH FOR OTHERS WHEN IN NEED,DURING EARTHQUAKES, FLOODS FAMINES,AND EPIDEMICS,CANT TAKE CARE OF ITS OWN PEOPLE,CALLING HEALTHCARE A THREAT TO OUR OUR WAY OF LIFE……..TEA PARTY DOGMA AND.CHRISTIAN HYPOCRISY WRAPPED UP IN AN UN AMERICAN FLAG OF EXCLUSION…..PRAISE JESUS NOT

  5. MOEHOWEIRD THE PROFIT May 17, 2014 at 4:29 pm

    we don’t need health care for the old even if they were taxpayers, even if they raised their children to die in foreign lands,even if they raised their children to become good citizens, even if they were against segregation, even if they protested against unjust wars and labeled un patriotic, even if they had not become productive citizens due to obstacles placed in their path by laws that impeded them due to their color,they should just die with jesus in their hearts no matter what because that’s what the bible says …….!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: